- Education Center
- Care Tools
- Clinic Finder
Blog Entries With Tag: high carbs
Blog: Doris' Blog
Posted: Jan 20, 2009
I have to admit, I have been listening/watching lots of “stuff” about today’s inaugural events. The other day I saw the chef chosen for the inaugural luncheon interviewed on television.
Nice chap. However, as a diabetic I was listening to the ingredients used in preparing the dinner. Yes, I realize President Obama is not a diabetic. However, my blood sugar skyrocketed just listening. There was virtually nothing that did not have some extra form of sugar piled on or in it. It was hardly a low glycemic index meal much less a low carb meal! The redeeming feature, I suppose, was the vegetable medley – at least there was something green.
The menu consisted of:
· Seafood stew with a puffed pastry top
· Duck with cherry chutney/pheasant with wild rice stuffing
· Molasses whipped sweet potato
· Winter vegetables (asparagus, carrots, brussel sprouts and wax beans)
· Cinnamon apple sponge cake and sweet cream glaze
There were carbs, carbs and more carbs. I do not think I ever eat that much food or that many carbs in a two-day period, much less in one luncheon. Consider the flour for the rue and the puffed pastry on the stew, the cherry chutney, the wild rice, and the molasses and sweet potato. I will give the chef leeway on the dessert … they are supposed to be sugar laden.
I guess it is a good thing I am not a Washington insider. I would have been very hungry since I could not even have eaten the protein (covered in cherry chutney). However, considering the obesity and type 2 diabetes epidemics, could the crew who chose the luncheon menu and ingredients think about the sugar/carbohydrate quantity for a minute or two? There were 200 invited guests. I guarantee some of them are diabetics and not necessarily insulin dependent (to “cover” the carbs). It is an epidemic after all; Washington cannot possibly be immune to the event.
I also guarantee most people would never say anything or ask if there is an alternative. People tend to get embarrassed in their own families (much less a State event) and either eat all the sugar laden food or skip the meal entirely. In either case, there are consequences to pay, minimally, for the rest of the day.
I also know some people still maintain diabetics can eat anything as long as they count carbs and inject insulin. I do not believe that. The timing never works. There is always a low and a high or both. The Russian roulette game of large volumes of insulin is just too difficult.
In addition, many do not attempt to maintain a tight glucose level so they may not care about their blood sugar as I do. Many just say, “It is only one day.” That has just never been my philosophy. That is not to say I am a “miss good two shoes,” it is just that I have paid the price in earlier years and I am not willing to pay the price any longer. The advent of glucose monitors provides some sort of “in your face” reminder of the consequences.
Therefore, I ask the new administration and their chefs to please be more cognizant of the example being set in the White House. If we, as a country, are going to put a stop to the obesity and type 2 diabetes epidemics, it cannot be a bottom up event. It needs to start at the top. Please … less sugar clad foods, fewer carbs, more healthy and heavens, smaller meals!
Doris J. Dickson
Related posts:Quinoa – it’s not a grain – it’s a vegetable – high in protein! | A Diabetes Diagnosis: Finding the Motivation | Review of The Diabetes Prevention & Management Cookbook | Ontario doctors urge fast-food chains, schools to list calories | Detective Dentistry | Preventing Type2 | When World's Collide | U might have diabetes but u do not know | Type 2 diabetic camp for children and KidsType2Diabetes.ca | Daily recommended limit of sugar on food labels
Blog: Doris' Blog
Posted: Dec 7, 2008
According to this article in today's online version of the Endocrine Today it is no more effective to attempt to screen type 2 patients looking for gene markers than it is to use the traditional risk factors (weight, blood pressure and actual glucose levels).
Not being one of those who believes that type 2 is "predominately" genetic, I can not say I am surprised. I am one of those who believes that there may be "some" genetics behind the scenes but that "nurture" has more to play in the onset of this versions of diabetes.
I believe that human bodies were not made for the eating and activity levels of today's man. We were men created to be active, survivalists who ate from the land. That means meat and fish and greens, etc. that were put here when we were.
Many indications are given that the "grain" evolution was the start of the our bodies trying but being unable to adapt. After all, as much as we love them, how long has it actually been since we could turn a healthy blueberry into a tasty but very unhealthy blueberry muffin?
I am also a firm believer that we do much of the damage to ourselves. Our bodies are just not intended to handle the volume of insulin we force them too. Even I, as a thin, insulin sensitive person can push my body to wear it doesn't want to be. On the days following "cheat" events I can see where glucose is just handled entirely different by my injections of insulin. I am much less sensitive after a Thanksgiving Day or other holiday event filled with more than my normal lower carb standard day. It just doesn't work.
Now, were I not be entirely insulin-dependent and testing my blood sugar repeatedly throughout the day, as well as keeping a log and analyzing my body's behavior, I would have no clue I too can create insulin resistance - by eating higher carb and thus requiring substantially more than normal insulin.
My point ... those who do not take insulin or have a meter and eat high carb day in and day out have no idea until they've done the damage that they are doing damage.
So ... therefore, I understand the results of this study (albeit there should be further studies/follow-up). I believe that you if you look at someone's day in and day out food/activity etc. diary, you are much more likely to predict the onset of type 2 diabetes than with any genetic testing.
But that's just one person's opinion ...
Doris J. Dickson
Related posts:Inaugural Luncheon Menu | The lows and the highs of diabetes